Beyond Accept or Reject: The New Models Reshaping Peer Review
From published reports and portable reviews to preprint assessment, reviewer credit and AI rules, peer review is diversifying faster than the evidence on it.


Independent news and analysis on research and scholarly publishing — from JCF Corp.
4 stories
From published reports and portable reviews to preprint assessment, reviewer credit and AI rules, peer review is diversifying faster than the evidence on it.
A retraction count is a warning sign, not a complete diagnosis of the scientific system. The reasons behind the numbers matter.
Suspicious manuscripts do not always arrive with obvious warning signs. Some are designed to look like ordinary submissions.
Corrections metadata, persistent identifiers, contributor roles, linked data and editorial audit trails make the history of a paper checkable.